“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after some distance they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These kinds of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous noticed.
Online access to civil and criminal cases in decide on circuit courts. Cases may very well be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal for the deceased was caused via the petitioner but in support of opinion from the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is out there about the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is not really binding about the Court.
Note: Please fill any subject and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave subject blank.
Now it is properly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different, therefore, inside our view the discovered Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner with the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the target.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders maintaining in view that among the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out by the counsel for the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
Usually, only an appeal accepted from the court of final vacation resort will resolve these types of differences and, For a lot of reasons, this kind of appeals in more info many cases are not granted.
2. I have heard the uncovered counsel to the parties and also acquired DPG at length, perused the record and observed that:-
Criminal cases From the common legislation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same form of case.
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property might also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
This section specifically applies to civil servants who are rendered surplus a result of the reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, aren't matter to your provisions of your Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the using organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11-A, such as the possibility of being posted to another department, would not utilize to non-civil servants. Read more